The games people play
A thought occured to me while I was putting in my new floors. This blog. When I posted my first, I was ranting, it was for me and I was standing on a little soapbox to rant. No game there. Then I got two replies and an email where I believed I was being attacked, and I vollied back. No real game there. But somewhere between there and realizing that I was fighting more for the sake of fighting, I started playing games. I started following rules of engagement. I'd only pick up the little verbal dodgeballs of phrases thrown at me to throw back. To make matters worse, I would only using those balls when I could still throw them back with a kind of self-righteous impunity.
And when I was out and out wrong, (throwing a medicine ball that could not be thrown back easily) I called a time out, I went got back that ball that was intended to smack Luthien right in the face and called foul on myself. I took the ball out of play, and did it so specifically so I would look at myself as a better person for it. How is that not a game?
I AM one of those people that say 'I hate the games people play'. How did I miss it in myself?
Is it possible to see a game for a game, when the game disguises itself as real life? Is it possible to say to oneself "Whoa, I'm serving my own interest here, and by doing so, not doing the right thing by others involved"? How do you gracefully bow out, when in the heat of life, to say "I've started playing a game with you, that is not right or fair to you" and not still be playing? Wouldn't that be a strategic withdrawl? I'm confused as to where the line is.
Is it possible to lead a regular life, not play head games with those people who are in that 'regular life'?
Then there is the flip side of the coin. When someone is playing a game with you, how can you distinguish a game from honesty?
Brandon (sorry for using you as reference) thought I was playing a game in my first post. I wasn't. But by my second post I was. I must have been, by then I was using my rules of engagement. But if I didn't know I was playing a game at the time, then who's to say when it became a game? If the person playing games doesn't know it to be a game, when it is....arrg, it's just so confusing and circular. A great big catch-22.
Is there an easy way to recognize and stop playing games? If there is, is it the right thing to do? The only people I can think of that wouldn't play games are people like Ghandi, Mother Theresa, and the Dali Lama. They each give/gave selflessly but they lead/led very solitary lives. Public but on the whole, solitary. Maybe there's the answer. To not play games, you can't get or be close to people. You can do for people, you can love people, but you must remain apart from people. Maybe to be a part of (community, family, friends) you resign yourself to a game from time to time, and keep the hope that there isn't too much collateral damage.
The thought strikes me as sad, but I don't see any other easy answer.
3 Comments:
How morbidly yet wonderfully thought provoking.
In my own opinion...and I know I wont be exactly right here....I would have to say that engaging in a disagreement wouldn't be exactly a game. When I think games, I think of something much more personal.
Certainly there are rules of engagement with EVERYTHING we do, right down to how we smile to our neighbors when we hate the fact that they make stinky food. But we would hesitate to call THAT a game, right?
I dunno....I see the way that we all "re-acted" to one another as being a natural response. Most everyone will act on the defense when they are attacked. However, not everyone can admitt that they did wrong with the grace and poise that you did. That takes class I think. I'm being serious too...not kissing ass. I've not seen someone say, "Hey! I am wrong and I'm sorry." in the way that you did. I'd say that you are a bigger person than I to do so.
Anyway, here is the secret that my mom tried to teach me...the key to dealing with any situtation is to ACT upon it rather than to REACT upon it. When one reacts to a situation, they flame the energy. When one ACTS upon it, they neutralize the energy. Obvioulsy, I'm still working on it!! LOL!
Just a thought....so you don't have to be by yourself forever...
Sorry to butt in, but the other day I had a native sounding proverb read to me... I cannot recall the exact words but the moral of it was that we all have a side that hates and we all have a side that loves and the one that wins is the one we feed.
I know most people reading this try to live a life of feeding the loving side, but occasionally, when our loving side gets hurt, we tend to overfeed the hating side. Overfeeding results in a lack to do much of anything except sit and complain more and more and more... in a circle.
I honestly think the key to 'engagements' much like what went on here and on Pizz Off is knowing what to take personally, and what to shrug off as anger-induced.
We all said things that were probably best left unsaid but we cannot take back the past. We've all learned from this, whether it be life-changing, thought-provoking, or just learning how unique all of us truly are in our thoughts and perceptions. And that in itself is rather priceless.
Now calmer heads are prevailing and look! Rational conversation is being explored in depth. No personal baggage is being used as a weapon or as a weakness.
In wondering who is being honest and who is playing, remember one thing... your gut instinct is never wrong. As a Pagan, that message is all too prevelant. As a person in society, that message gets lost from time to time. Human instinct is to trust everyone that they are being honest and sincere, funny considering how many deceptive people we all have been in contact throughout our lives.
If it's not my place to comment on this, please feel free to tell me... I'll try not overfeed my umm...negative side, but I am only human.
Oh I'm dizzy from the swelling of my head. Thanks for the compliment just me. My mom always told me 'IF' you truly find some fault of yours in an argument, to find that fault, and any other minor faults that may be there and be sincere in an apology. Let me tell you it's much easier to do on paper, I think I would have choked on all my words had I said them in person. They were exceptionally hard to admit. (I HATE to admit my own wrongs, I just know that I gotta) As for acting vs reacting... Well I got my work cut out for me there too. I get what you're saying about personal rules of engagement though. When it's considered, we have rules of engagement for every situation in life where you are going into an unknown situation.
Raven:
Your opinions are ALWAYS welcome here. I think I understant what the proverb was saying, and yes, I do try very hard to feed my love side more than my Grr side, I guess you're right in that sometimes the other (Grr) side needs a bite too (I've been starving the beast for soo long)
I've thought about the fact that there seem to be an overabundance of deceptive people, but many of us fail to see their deceptiveness until it is far too late. I think that is because there is a human assumption that people are people, and since you are a people, then more or less all people are like you, way down deep at the centre. Something like object oriented programming, where the class is the same, and it's only the attributes that change. Anyhow, thanks for coming to my blog. I hope to see you from time to time
Post a Comment
<< Home